feat(ci): package-registry provenance#38
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Package-registry provenance
Adds native build provenance attestation to the npm publish workflow (
.github/workflows/publish.yml).Per-ecosystem changes
permissions:block (contents: read+id-token: write) to thepublish-npmjob, and changednpm publish --access public->npm publish --provenance --access public. The job publishes to the public registry (registry-url: https://registry.npmjs.org), so provenance applies.Notes
package.json(it is a Deno/ReScript project per CLAUDE.md; deps viadeno.json). The existingpublish.ymlnonetheless runsnpm ci/npm publish. Because there is nopackage.json, there is norepositoryfield present for npm provenance to reference — npm requires arepositoryfield that matches the GitHub repo for--provenanceto succeed at publish time. This was not fixed here (additive provenance change only); flagging for owner attention.permissions: contents: readalready existed at file head; the job-level block is additive and scoped to the publish job.🤖 Generated with Claude Code